Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Gram-negative isolates from urine and wound specimens in a tertiary health facility in southern Nigeria

Helen O Ogefere1 , Patience A Aigbiremwen2, Richard Omoregie1

1Department of Medical Laboratory Science, School of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Benin; 2School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.

For correspondence:-  Helen Ogefere   Email: helenogefere@yahoo.com

Received: 21 March 2015        Accepted: 23 May 2015        Published: 29 June 2015

Citation: Ogefere HO, Aigbiremwen PA, Omoregie R. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Gram-negative isolates from urine and wound specimens in a tertiary health facility in southern Nigeria. Trop J Pharm Res 2015; 14(6):1089-1094 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v14i6.22

© 2015 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) producing Gram negative bacteria causing wound and urinary tract infections among in- and out-patients in a tertiary health facility. 
Methods: The presence of ESBL was determined among 230 Gram negative bacilli isolated from wound (105) and urine (125) specimens from in- and out-patients who attended University of Benin Teaching Hospital (UBTH) for treatment using the double disc synergy method. Disc susceptibility test was performed on all isolates using standard techniques.
Results: There was no significant difference in the prevalence of ESBL production between isolates from wound (47.6 %) and urine (41.6 %) as well as between in-patients (48.8 %) and out–patients (39.38 %). Enterobacter species were the most prevalent producers of ESBL from both wound and urine specimens as well as from both in- and out–patients. Bacterial isolates that produced ESBL were more resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin compared to non-ESBL producers.
Conclusion: A high prevalence (44.3%) of ESBL producing Gram–negative bacteria was observed among the patients, with Enterobacter species being the most prevalent. Prudent use of antibacterial agents is advocated to stem the tide.

Keywords: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, Enterobacter species, Wound, Urine, Gram negative bacteria

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates